Is 42%-Contributing Too Low for a CD?
Well, let’s look at the “idea” behind a CD as explained by the City in Neighborhood Meetings:
Replacing 58% of homes seems drastic. How does
Other CDs in Dallas
Average CD in Dallas: 91% Contributing
CD2: 85% Contributing, 4 Styles.
How did this happen?
The Neighborhood Committee submitted an Inventory of our homes when applying for an Expansion. They gave our 275 homes one of 7 style labels, no matter what the style. Six of those styles were claimed to be 75%. This got the application through the City approval process (The Determination of Eligibility) because the City did not check the Inventory. Here is the difference between an expert report on the Inventory of our homes and what the Neighborhood Committee submitted:
BAD
It is disappointing that we cannot trust our neighbors.
WORSE
It is worse that the City allowed this to happen.
REALLY!?
City’s response to “Did you or anyone else check the veracity of the Inventory?”
“The inventory was submitted only as part of the determination of eligibility in order for Bill to determine whether the area met the eligibility requirements per the ordinance. The list, as submitted, has no bearing on the ordinance itself, only the eligibility determination.
Please let me know if you have any other questions.” – City Planning and Urban Development
Related Topics
Proposed Solution: Tax Abatements.
Incentives work, Controls Do Not
Draft Released September 2024 Changes are Red Herrings.
Draft still designed to CONTROL, despite Petitioners’ claims.
Did the Latest Draft Change Anything?
Petitioners Misled Us
City Approval Process Used Inaccurate Information
Impact on Determination of Eligibility
Bad Data in Neighborhood Meetings
Accuracy After the Fact? Letter from Chief Planner, August 31, 2023.